Posts Tagged ‘Tea Party’

HP4

Sunday, February 5th, 2012

In the First Person: Leon Valley’s Ordinance 

by Matt Troy

I work with E.R.A. Troy, Realtors and attended the first meeting in Leon Valley to discuss the proposed new city ordinance for their city. The city mayor asked that as we speak, we quote the provision ordinance number we were referring to. After reading the ordinance, I was upset on the overreaching provisions and stipulations on how we can enjoy and must maintain our own homes and properties. One provision said no more than five pieces of lawn furniture or statuary such as birdbaths would be allowed in a front yard. What caught my eye and the reason I showed up at the meeting was the provision below.

The ordinance states, “Whenever it is necessary to make an inspection to enforce this article, or whenever the enforcement authority has reasonable cause…

Click Here to Read More and Comment…

Event Videos

Wednesday, December 7th, 2011

San Anotnio Tea Party Meeting – January 15th, 2012 – Part 1

 

San Anotnio Tea Party Meeting – January 15th, 2012 – Part 2

 

George Rodriguez and Ken Bennight Address the SATP Meeting – December 4th, 2011

LTG Leroy Sisco (USA Ret.) and Jonathan Wheeler – Military Warriors Support Foundation

Dr. John Vanderpool as Thomas Jefferson – December 4th, 2011

Robin Juhl Reads the Gettysburg Address – December 4th, 2011

Greg Flores – Jerusalem – December 4th, 2011

Hector Melendez – The Code of Conduct – December 4th, 2011

 

San Antonio Tea Party September 18, 2011 meeting

 

Justice Hilbig:

Michael Quinn Sullivan – Empower Texans:

George’s State of the Tea Party Address:

 

San Antonio Tea Party Mid-Summer meeting August 7, 2011 – Guest Speaker Kevin Jackson

 

 

San Antonio Tea Party Senate Candidates Forum – Tom Leppert

San Antonio Tea Party Senate Candidates Forum – Ted Cruz

San Antonio Tea Party Senate Candidates Forum – Elizabeth Ames Jones

San Antonio Tea Party Senate Candidates Forum – Glenn Addison

San Antonio Tea Party Senate Candidate’s Forum – Lela Pettinger

San Antonio Tea Party Senate Candidate Forum – Andrew Castanuela


April 17th, Event

Video from SATP President, Ken Bennight, on the new structure for SATP.

Application

You may fill and send the Application Online if you choose, otherwise click  Application to print out this application, scan and e-mail it to Sharon Hall, sharon@sanantonioteaparty.us . If you prefer, Fax: 210-568-2962or snail mail it to: San Antonio Tea Party, 10650 Culebra Road, Suite 104 PMB 548,  San Antonio, TX  78251

Back to Basics Rally, Capitol in Austin, July 31, 2010

If you love America and want it to remain

“the land that we love”, these videos will bring

tears to your eyes.

Please share our website with your friends.

A video by Eric Adam was introduced to an inspired crowd. To view click here.

Pictures of the event, here

These are videos from different San Antonio Tea Party events as well as from protests and meet your representative meetings.

New! From SATP’s Health Care Protest on December 16th – with music!

San Antonio Tea Party Protest


Listen to Julia and Jeanne Haden talk about the San Antonio Tea Party  01-san antonio tea party


San Antonio Tea Party In D.C.  9-12-09


San Antonio Tea Party In D.C.  9-12-09


San Antonio Tea Party In D.C.  9-12-09


San Antonio Tea Party In D.C.  9-12-09


San Antonio Tea Party In D.C.  9-12-09



Michael Knowles Interview With MSNBC (sorry for the poor quality,  I’m trying to get a better copy)



Tea Party Express At Alamo Plaza 9-3-09 Video 1


Tea Party Express At Alamo Plaza 9-3-09 Video 2


Tea Party Express At Alamo Plaza 9-3-09 Video 3


Tea Party Express At Alamo Plaza 9-3-09 Video 4


Tea Party Express At Alamo Plaza 9-3-09 Video 5


Tea Party Express At Alamo Plaza 9-3-09 Video 6

Tea Party Express At Alamo Plaza 9-3-09


Health Care Rally Outside Ciro Rodriguez’s Office 8-22-09

Ciro Rodriguez Coffee – Helotes July 2009

Ciro Rodriguez Coffee – Helotes July 2009


Ciro Rodriguez Coffee – Helotes July 2009


Just Say No Rally- Austin, TX 8-9-2009 Video 1


Just Say No Rally- Austin, TX 8-9-2009 Video 2


Just Say No Rally- Austin, TX 8-9-2009 Video 3

Am I A Patriot?

Tuesday, October 6th, 2009

AM I A PATRIOT?

When I think of a Patriot, George Washington, Thomas Jefferson, Benjamin Franklin come to mind. How could I even consider myself a Patriot? In reviewing my American history I remembered:

The Patriots of 1776 believed:

* in Natural Law which was based on God’s Laws and used these laws to build the Constitution

*in limited government

*in protecting the family and the institution of marriage

*in self-preservation

*in justice by reparation

*in the right to bear arms

*in no taxation without representation

*all men are created equal

*in “Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness”

*those representing “the People” work for the people

As I read through these, I realize that I believe the same things, so I will consider myself a Patriot.  I may not be in the same league, but I believe just as strongly.   The difference is they were Patriots of the structuring of a brand new country bound for glory.   I am a Tea Party Patriot working to bring back to focus the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and Natural Law in order to protect the country the 1776 Patriots envisioned.  The San Antonio Tea Party is a group of people of all races and professions who are nonpartisan, peaceful, well-organized, and intelligent .  If you believe as the Patriots, come work with us .   It just might relieve your frustration and help you have your voice heard.

Beverly Bybee

Protest At Blue Cross 9-22-09

Tuesday, September 22nd, 2009

Hello Pattriots,

We had a good turnout despite the weather today.  We had a dozen hard core Patriots out there standing in the rain.  We got lots of honks and thumbs up from passing cars.

Joni Schmidt from the Boerne Tea Party was there with some of their group.  We even had someone drive all the way from Laredo just to show her support.

I was interviewed by WOAI and Fox 29 as well as KTSA 550a.m.   Watch the 5, 6 and 10 newscast for the interviews.

Thanks again to everyone who showed up and thanks to those who couldn’t make it but were there in spirit.

Constitutional Amendment Election, November 3, 2009

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

There is a Texas Constitutional Amendment Election coming up on November 3, 2009. The San Antonio Tea Party encourages you to get informed on the issues and make your voice heard. Off year elections are notorious for low voter turnouts. So if you don’t want to wake up on November 4th and say “How did that pass?” then you need to get involved.

Here are some important dates that Texas voters should be aware of:

Constitutional Amendment Election, November 3, 2009

First Day to Apply for Ballot by Mail:
September 4, 2009

Last Day to Register to Vote:
October 5, 2009 (moves to next business day, Monday)

First Day of Early Voting:
October 19, 2009 (17th day before election day falls on a Saturday, first day moves to next business day)

Last Day to Apply for Ballot by Mail:
(Received, not postmarked) October 27, 2009

Last Day of Early Voting:
October 30, 2009

What Proposition 1 Says:

HJR 132 (History of HJR 132)

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the financing, including through tax increment financing, of the acquisition by municipalities and counties of buffer areas or open spaces adjacent to a military installation for the prevention of encroachment or for the construction of roadways, utilities, or other infrastructure to protect or promote the mission of the military installation.”

What Proposition 1 Means:
(HJR 132)

HJR 132 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to allow a municipality or a county to issue bonds and notes to finance the purchase of buffer areas or open spaces adjacent to military installations. The buffer areas would be used to prevent encroachment or to construct roadways utilities, or other infrastructure to protect or promote the mission of the military installation. The municipality or county may pledge increases in ad valorem tax revenues for repayment of the bonds or notes.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment authorizing the financing, including through tax increment financing, of the acquisition by municipalities and counties of buffer areas or open spaces adjacent to a military installation for the prevention of encroachment or for the construction of roadways, utilities, or other infrastructure to protect or promote the mission of the military installation.”

What Proposition 2 Says:

HJR 36-1 (History of HJR 36-1)

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for the ad valorem taxation of a residence homestead solely on the basis of the property’s value as a residence homestead.”

What Proposition 2 Means:
(HJR 36 – #1)

HJR 36 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to provide for the taxation of a residence homestead solely on the basis of the property’s value as a residence homestead, regardless of whether the property may have a higher value if it were used for other purposes.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to provide for the ad valorem taxation of a residence homestead solely on the basis of the property’s value as a residence homestead.”

What Proposition 3 Says:

HJR 36-3 (History of HJR 36-3)

“The constitutional amendment providing for uniform standards and procedures for the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes.”

What Proposition 3 Means:
(HJR 36 – #3)

HJR 36 would amend the constitution to require the legislature to provide for the administration and enforcement of uniform standards and procedures for appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment providing for uniform standards and procedures for the appraisal of property for ad valorem tax purposes.”

What Proposition 4 Says:

HJR 14-2 (History of HJR 14-2)

“The constitutional amendment establishing the national research university fund to enable emerging research universities in this state to achieve national prominence as major research universities and transferring the balance of the higher education fund to the national research university fund.”

What Proposition 4 Means:
(HJR 14 – #2)

HJR 14 would amend the constitution to establish the national research university fund to provide a source of funding that will enable emerging research universities in this state to develop into major research universities. The amendment would require the legislature to dedicate state revenue to the fund and to transfer the balance of the existing higher education fund to the national research university fund. This amendment would further require the legislature to establish the criteria by which a state university may become eligible to receive and use distributions from the fund.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment establishing the national research university fund to enable emerging research universities in this state to achieve national prominence as major research universities and transferring the balance of the higher education fund to the national research university fund.”

What Proposition 5 Says:

HJR 36-2 (History of HJR 36-2)

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to authorize a single board of equalization for two or more adjoining appraisal entities that elect to provide for consolidated equalizations.”

What Proposition 5 Means:
(HJR 36 – #2)

HJR 36 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to allow for a single appraisal review board for two or more adjoining appraisal entities that elect to provide for consolidated reviews of tax appraisals.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment authorizing the legislature to authorize a single board of equalization for two or more adjoining appraisal entities that elect to provide for consolidated equalizations.”

What Proposition 6 Says:

HJR 116 (History of HJR 116)

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the Veterans’ Land Board to issue general obligation bonds in amounts equal to or less than amounts previously authorized.”

What Proposition 6 Means:
(HJR 116)

HJR 116 would amend the constitution to authorize the Veterans’ Land Board to issue general obligation bonds, subject to certain constitutional limits, for the purpose of selling land and providing home or land mortgage loans to veterans of the state.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment authorizing the Veterans ’ Land Board to issue general obligation bonds in amounts equal to or less than amounts previously authorized.”

What Proposition 7 Says:

HJR 127 (History of HJR 127)

“The constitutional amendment to allow an officer or enlisted member of the Texas State Guard or other state militia or military force to hold other civil offices.”

What Proposition 7 Means:
(HJR 127)

HJR 127 would amend the constitution to allow an officer or enlisted member of the Texas State Guard or other state militia or military force to hold other civil offices.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment to allow an officer or enlisted member of the Texas State Guard or other state militia or military force to hold other civil offices.”

What Proposition 8 Says:

HJR 7 (History of HJR 7)

“The constitutional amendment authorizing the state to contribute money, property, and other resources for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of veterans hospitals in this state.”

What Proposition 8 Means:
(HJR 7)

HJR 7 would amend the constitution to authorize the state to contribute money, property, and other resources for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of veterans’ hospitals in this state.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment authorizing the state to contribute money, property, and other resources for the establishment, maintenance, and operation of veterans hospitals in this state.”

What Proposition 9 Says:

HJR 102 (History of HJR 102)

“The constitutional amendment to protect the right of the public, individually and collectively, to access and use the public beaches bordering the seaward shore of the Gulf of Mexico.”

What Proposition 9 Means:
(HJR 102)

HJR 102 would define what is a state-owned public beach. The public, individually and collectively, would have an unrestricted right to use and a right of ingress to and egress from a public beach. The amendment would authorize the legislature to enact laws to protect these rights.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment to protect the right of the public, individually and collectively, to access and use the public beaches bordering the seaward shore of the Gulf of Mexico.”

What Proposition 10 Says:

HJR 85 (History of HJR 85)

“The constitutional amendment to provide that elected members of the governing boards of emergency services districts may serve terms not to exceed four years.”

What Proposition 10 Means:
(HJR 85)

HJR 85 would amend the constitution to authorize the legislature to provide that members of the governing board of an emergency services district may serve terms not to exceed four years.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment to provide that elected members of the governing boards of emergency services districts may serve terms not to exceed four years.”

What Proposition 11 Says:

HJR 14-1 (History of HJR 14-1)

“The constitutional amendment to prohibit the taking, damaging, or destroying of private property for public use unless the action is for the ownership, use, and enjoyment of the property by the State, a political subdivision of the State, the public at large, or entities granted the power of eminent domain under law or for the elimination of urban blight on a particular parcel of property, but not for certain economic development or enhancement of tax revenue purposes, and to limit the legislature’s authority to grant the power of eminent domain to an entity.”

What Proposition 11 Means:
(HJR 14 – #1)

HJR 14 would amend the constitution to provide that the taking of private property for public use (“eminent domain”) is authorized only if it is for the ownership, use, and enjoyment of the property by the State, its political subdivisions, the public at large, or by entities granted the power of eminent domain, or for the removal of urban blight. The amendment would prohibit the taking of private property for transfer to a private entity for the purpose of economic development or to increase tax revenues. The amendment would also limit the legislature’s authority to grant the power of eminent domain in the future unless it is approved by a two-thirds vote of all the members elected to each house.

The proposed amendment would appear on the ballot as follows: “The constitutional amendment to prohibit the taking, damaging, or destroying of private property for public use unless the action is for the ownership, use, and enjoyment of the property by the State, a political subdivision of the State, the public at large, or entities granted the power of eminent domain under law or for the elimination of urban blight on a particular parcel of property, but not for certain economic development or enhancement of tax revenue purposes, and to limit the legislature ’s authority to grant the power of eminent domain to an entity.”

For additional material on these amendments please go to http://www.lwvtexas.org/2009VG/2009CAVG%5BFINAL%5D.pdf

You can read the proposed amendments at the Texas Secretary Of States site:

Ballot Language and Order for the November 3rd, 2009, Constitutional Amendment Election:
http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/voter/2009novballotlang.shtml

Explanatory Statements for the November 3rd, 2009, Constitutional Amendment Election:
http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/voter/2009novballotexp.shtml

Tea Partiers Call Movement Better Organized Than GOP

Thursday, September 10th, 2009

From Foxnews 9-80-9

Using a dozen social networking sites to mobilize constituents opposed to big government spending, the grassroots movement has taken on issues far beyond taxes to protest President Obama’s sweeping agenda.  And by all appearances, its efforts have not gone unnoticed.

They claim to be a grassroots movement, but critics call them astro-turf. (We are grassroots, astro-turf doesn’t grow!)  In either case, the Tea Party movement is quickly shaking off its “greenness” to become a force that some coalition members contend is more effective than the Republican Party.

“This movement has done more to give conservatives a voice than the GOP has in the past eight years,” said Dana Loesch, a conservative radio talk show host and member of the Nationwide Tea Party Coalition. “Republicans have been following the Tea Party’s lead since February.”

“I think it’s fair to say this is not a Republican-sponsored movement,” said Brendan Steinhauser,an organizer who described supporters as “conservatives, independents, and libertarians” concerned over the “size and scope of the government.”

Tea Partiers got their start last fall as a disorganized bunch of disaffected voters who were furious about the Bush administration’s Wall Street bailout. Then, Steinhauser said, these opponents of excessive government spending were pushed over the edge by President Obama’s call for a $787 billion stimulus.

Using a dozen social networking sites to mobilize constituents opposed to big-government spending, the movement took root in February after a group of individuals used Twitter to react to CNBC on-air editor Rick Santelli’s “rant,” in which he accused the government of “promoting bad behavior” in regard to the Homeowners Affordability and Stability Plan, and raised the idea of a “Chicago Tea Party.”

Since then, the movement has taken on issues far beyond taxes and spending, and has found it is able to mobilize mass responses in short order.

Movement organizers last week were quick to lash out against Obama’s plan to speak directly to students in their first week of school, and the accompanying lesson plan drawn up by the White House.

Within hours of the White House’s announcement, the Nationwide Tea Party Coalition launched a Web site called “Hall Pass on That,” offering an alternative for students who did not wish to view the president’s address.
The group called on school administrators to let students opt out of assignments requiring them to write letters about what they could do to “help the president.” School districts like Lindburgh School District in St. Louis, Mo., chose not to broadcast the speech live after coalition members contacted school administrators to protest its viewing.

But it’s that kind of influence that has some questioning the group’s independence.

At first, Tea Partiers relied heavily upon social networking sites like Twitter, Facebook, and Ning to organize rallies quickly and efficiently and to raise money in all 50 states. But the movement is now spearheaded by an alliance of several conservative groups — including FreedomWorks, Tea Party Patriots, Resistnet.com and the National Taxpayers Union.

Steinhauser is director of federal and state campaign for FreedomWorks, the non-profit organization founded in 1984 by former House Majority Leader Dick Armey. Counted on its board of directors is none less than entrepreneur and former Republican presidential candidate Steve Forbes.

FreedomWorks is now a central organizer getting out the message about Tea Party events, and has largely funded the rallies leading up to Saturday’s march in Washington, D.C., where “tens of thousands” are expected to attend.

The march will be the culmination of a 34-city, 7,000 mile Tea Party Express bus tour that began Aug. 28 in Sacramento, Calif. And the Tea Partiers meet in D.C. with a message for Obama — large-scale opposition to the current plans for a health care overhaul, among other policies, and a demand that health insurance reform create more competition and be guided by market principles, not a government-run plan.

“People on the right just typically don’t protest,” Steinhauser said of the rallies highlighting the Tea Party Express.
The Tea Partiers’ opponents say the group is highly organized, but leaders in the movement disagree among themselves even about who is the leader, or whether there is one.

Steinhauser told FOXNews.com on Tuesday that the idea for a Sept. 12 march was his. But other activists insist there is no leader and that the movement is strictly a groundswell.

Conveying news and information about the Tea Party events also has an unruly quality about it. The movement has attracted the attention of popular conservative commentators like Rush Limbaugh and Glenn Beck as well as support from Democrats like New Hampshire state legislator Joel Winters, who is expected to speak at Saturday’s mass rally in Washington.

But it also touts folk heroes like out-of-work, every-man “Joe the Plumber” as a draw to its rallies.

The White House has so far made little mention of the organized movement, and it declined to comment for this article. In an Aug. 4 off-camera briefing with reporters, White House Press Secretary Robert Gibbs alluded to the coalition, saying, “I hope people will take a jaundiced eye to what is clearly the astro-turf nature of so-called grassroots lobbying.”

“Clearly the White House is shaken up by the opposition,” said Steinhauser. “They’ve basically lied about us. Mr. Gibbs has made comments saying we’re encouraging people to disrupt town hall meetings. That’s a total fabrication.”

Groups like the left-leaning Center for American Progress have characterized the movement as nothing more than a manipulative organization aimed at thwarting progressive reform.

“The deep-seated concerns being expressed by a minority of the American public are being used and manipulated by corporate interests to defeat progressive reform,” Faiz Shakir, research director at the Center for American Progress, told FOXNews.com in a statement. “The deep pockets of big oil and insurers are funding the tea parties in order to misdirect popular anger against an agenda that would actually serve the interests of many of the protesters.”

Even Republican leaders likes House Minority Whip Eric Cantor recognize that Tea Partiers can do more to whip up support than those confined to Capitol Hill.

“The party, when it has been on the ascendency, it has always been from the ground up, it hasn’t been from the top down, so it is not something that can be tightly controlled from a centralized point,” Cantor told FOXNews.com. “The strength of the party is premised on the strength of this country, which comes from the people, not from Washington.”

Coalition members credit the movement’s success to its focus on traditional conservative principles they claim Republicans have abandoned in recent years. Loesch added that the GOP hasn’t done enough to support the candidacies of Republicans who represent those principles — like former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin, former presidential candidate Fred Thompson and Minnesota Rep. Michelle Bachmann.

“We’ve seen more support online from the grassroots for people like Palin than we ever saw from the GOP,” she said.