Comments on: Constitutional Amendment Election, November 3, 2009

By: Zana Lauck

Zana Lauck — Sat, 03 Apr 2010 14:22:02 +0000

This article is really fantastic. thank you.
Constitutional Amendment Election, November 3, 2009

By: Kim Rodriguez

Kim Rodriguez — Thu, 01 Apr 2010 23:42:25 +0000

This is great. Really nice post. Very Informative and helpful post. thank you.
Constitutional Amendment Election, November 3, 2009

By: Leah

Leah — Wed, 04 Nov 2009 07:20:25 +0000

I know it’s too late to matter for this election, but for future reference, the Texas Legislative Council Analyses of Proposed Amendments was quite helpful. From the introduction, it contains “ballot, the ballot language, an analysis, and the text of the joint resolution
proposing the amendment. The analysis includes background information and a summary of comments made about each proposed constitutional amendment by supporters and by opponents.”
See the pdf file here: http://www.tlc.state.tx.us/pubsconamend/analyses09/analyses09.pdf

I found this document at the website of the Texas Secretary of State, see here: http://www.sos.state.tx.us/elections/voter/whatisontheballot.shtml

Hope that helps for future education.

By: Sam J

Sam J — Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:05:40 +0000

I am now more confused than ever about how to vote. It seems the amendments are written in such a way that they are double speak and are not what they seem to be – or are they? Can someone really simplify this? I am not in favor of paying the government anything more, having them grab land, but I am in favor of anything that will help vets because they have served our country to protect us against all odds and despite what is going on at home to take away our freedom.

By: Sheri

Sheri — Thu, 22 Oct 2009 01:22:29 +0000

To the SATP,

All due respect for what you are doing however:

In response to #2 above, your organization should have never chosen to be a registered non-profit of the US.

This allows them to control you to an extremely advantageous degree.

If the more expensive option of choosing \"for profit\" status is opted for, the Govt. has much less control,

hence,

\"no pain, no gain.\"

By: Lloyd Byler

Lloyd Byler — Wed, 21 Oct 2009 23:37:16 +0000

This is everything you ever wanted to know about Rick Perry and his land grabbing tactics: http://www.perryfacts.com/trans_texas_corridor